MEF Dispatch: Qatar's Deadly Game; Iran: Mythology, Protests, and Poverty

среда, 17 сентября 2025 г.

Jonathan Spyer warns that Qatar is "playing arsonist and firefighter" in its dangerous ploy to host

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Powered by Axios HQ
Middle East Forum Banner

Qatar's Deadly Game; Iran: Mythology, Protests, and Poverty

By Winfield Myers ● Sep 17, 2025

Smart Brevity® count: 10 mins...2702 words

Jonathan Spyer warns that Qatar is "playing arsonist and firefighter" in its dangerous ploy to host and support Hamas terrorists while Western leaders ignore this reality to lavish praise on it. After Israel through its strike on Doha demonstrated that it will no longer play that game, Spyer urges Western powers to follow the Jewish state's lead. Michael Rubin writes that Israel's action brings a "moral clarity" to dealing with Qatar and urges the Gulf state's leaders to end their country's sponsorship of terror or risk becoming "Damascus rather than Dubai."

We follow with an in-depth look at Iran via eight articles. In a deep dive into Iran's history, Saeid Golkar explains the Islamic Republic's use of pre-Islamic mythology to bolster its legitimacy—and how Iranians turn these myths back on their tormentors. Mardo Soghom, in two articles, analyzes the protests on the anniversary of Mahsa Amini's murder and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's failures in this time of crisis. Other authors featured include Lazar Berman, Umud Shokri, Dalga Khatinoglu, and Ahmad Hashemi.

Playing Arsonist and Firefighter: How the West Is Falling for Qatar's Deadly Game

While condemning Israel for striking those who orchestrated October 7, Western leaders are lavishing praise on the Gulf emirate as if it were a trustworthy ally rather than a funder of global Islamism...
By: Jonathan Spyer

Amidst the heated discussion over Israel's assassination attempt on Hamas leaders in Qatar, the silence about Doha harboring these terrorists is deafening. Worse still, while condemning Israel for striking those who orchestrated October 7, Western leaders are lavishing praise on the Gulf emirate as if it were a trustworthy ally rather than a funder of global Islamism and terror.

Why it matters: Qatar funds global Islamism, undermining Western security and stability.

  • Doha supplies Hamas with financial and political backing, exacerbating regional tensions.

The big picture: Qatar's influence in the U.K. is pervasive, owning critical infrastructure and shaping policy through investments.

  • Its funding of British universities and Islamic centers spreads corrosive ideology.

  • With a new Middle East emerging, the U.K. and its allies need to urgently reconsider their relationships with Qatar or they risk being left behind and becoming ever more irrelevant. They would do well to remember that Qatar's legitimacy is dependent upon the West, and that it was their short-sighted thirst for Qatari gold that led us to this mess.

What's next: The West must break its dependency on Qatari investments to stay relevant in the new Middle East.

  • Israel last week demonstrated the intrinsic limits of such a strategy – it only works for as long as its victims acquiesce to it. Israel has now made clear that it will no longer play its allotted role.

To read the full article, click here.

The Problem with Doha: Why Israel's Hamas Attacks Outraged Qatar

Sheikh Tamim ibn Hamad Al Thani of Qatar (left) chairing the Emergency Arab-Islamic Summit to Address the Israeli attack on Qatar; Doha, Qatar, Sept. 15, 2025.  Shutterstock
By: Michael Rubin

Amidst Qatar's support for Hamas, Israel's September 9, 2025, strike on a Doha villa housing Hamas leaders was met with outrage by Qatar, with Prime Minister Sheik Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani demanding retaliation "from the whole region" against Israel.

Why it matters: Qatar's financial backing for Islamist groups fuels instability, yet Western leaders, like Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong, condemn Israel's actions instead.

  • Wong stated, "The Australian government believes this was the wrong thing to do," showcasing a misplaced focus while Qatar continues its support for terror.

The big picture: Qatar's influence affects global diplomacy, with investments swaying policies in countries like Australia.

  • Qatar's financial backing for Islamic centers and educational institutions spreads its extremist ideology, affecting global perceptions and security.

  • By any objective measure, Qatar also crosses a threshold that qualifies it for designation as a state sponsor of terror.

What's next: Western leaders, including those in Australia, must confront Qatar's dual role, leveraging diplomatic and economic tools to curb its support for terror.

  • International pressure and potential sanctions are needed to push Qatar to halt its backing of extremist movements.

To read the full article, click here.

ICYMI: September 17, 2025 | Israel Insider with Ashley Perry

September 17, 2025 | Israel Insider with Ashley Perry

What are the implications of Israel's ground operations in Gaza City?

Ashley Perry is an advisor to the Middle East Forum's Israel office. He served as adviser to Israel's minister of foreign affairs and deputy prime minister in 2009-15, and has also worked with Israel's Ministers of Intelligence, Agriculture and Rural Development, Energy, Water and Infrastructure, Defense, Tourism, Internal Security, and Immigrant Absorption and as an advisor to The Negev Forum. Originally from the U.K., he moved to Israel in 2001. He holds a B.A. from University College London and an M.A. from Reichman University (IDC Herzliya).

To watch the full podcast episode, click here.

The Stories That Shed Light on Power in Iran

A statue of Arash Kanmadar—Arash the Archer—a mythic heroic archer from the religious texts of Zoroastrianism, in the Sa'dabad palace complex built by the Qajar and Pahlavi monarchs.  Shutterstock
By: Saeid Golkar

In Iran, myths and religious narratives both empower the regime and fuel resistance movements.

  • These narratives are deeply rooted in cultural heritage, offering a framework for both governance and opposition.

Why it matters: The regime uses the religious myth of Ashura, commemorating Imam Hussein's martyrdom in 680 at the Battle of Karbala, to legitimize its authority and cast opponents as modern Yazids, representing tyranny.

  • This manipulation of religious stories supports the regime's narrative, reinforcing its grip on power while delegitimizing dissent.

The big picture: Pre-Islamic myths such as Zahak, a tyrant from Ferdowsi's "Shahnameh" ("Book of Kings") who feeds serpents on his shoulders with the brains of young men, are revived by dissidents to symbolize resistance against tyranny, portraying Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei as a modern-day Zahak.

  • This narrative taps into Iran's rich cultural heritage, fostering a powerful opposition identity.

Arash the Archer: A legendary figure in Iranian mythology, Arash Kanmadar symbolizes heroic self-sacrifice and national unity. He is known for ending a war by shooting an arrow across a vast distance to set a new border.

  • His story is used in regime propaganda to draw parallels between historical conflicts and modern geopolitical struggles, emphasizing themes of sacrifice and devotion to the homeland.

Cultural narratives and power: Myths create a hidden grammar that connects culture to political action, shaping Iran's regime and resistance.

  • The regime's survival strategy involves manipulating these myths to maintain power, while protesters leverage them to delegitimize the current leadership.

What's next: Understanding the role of mythology in Iran's political landscape is crucial for policymakers and scholars analyzing the regime's stability and opposition strategies.

  • Whether these forces and the myths upon which they rely to wage their war against each other will someday help Iranians reshape their political future is a question only time can answer.

To read the full article, click here.

New Protests Erupt in Iran on Anniversary of Mahsa Amini's Murder

The anniversary of the death of an Iranian woman, Masha Amini, in police custody draws protests in Iran and elsewhere.  Shutterstock
By: Mardo Soghom

Anti-regime protests erupted on September 16, 2025, marking the third anniversary of Mahsa Amini's death at the hands of police who arrested her for not covering her hair properly, a symbol of resistance against the Islamic Republic.

Why it matters: The anniversary coincides with heightened tensions following Israel's airstrikes, challenging the regime's military credibility and amplifying public dissent.

  • Economic hardships, including blackouts and currency collapse, fuel public anger and protest momentum.

The big picture: The regime appears nervous, staging public events in Tehran to project normalcy while simultaneously executing dissidents like Babak Shahbazi under dubious charges.

  • Despite social media users speculating about potential Israeli support for demonstrators, the regime's heavy-handed tactics since 2017 have instilled fear in potential protesters.

What's next: The upcoming European E3 (Britain, France, and Germany) sanctions threaten to exacerbate Iran's economic woes, further fueling unrest.

  • With President Masoud Pezeshkian's administration paralyzed by internal challenges and impending international sanctions, the regime faces a "perfect storm" of crises.

To read the full article, click here.

Iran's 'No Peace, No War' Dilemma Exposes Khamenei's Failed Calculus

Even after the war, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps continue to push the same ideological narrative, vowing to maintain the three pillars of the military doctrine...
By: Mardo Soghom

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei admits Iran is stuck in a "no peace, no war" scenario after crippling Israeli and U.S. strikes.

Why it matters: Iran's threats to exit the Non-Proliferation Treaty could deepen its diplomatic isolation and undermine any chance of a Western agreement.

  • Hardliners failed to pass a resolution to abandon the treaty, using it as a bargaining tactic amid E3's (Britain, France, and Germany) reimposition of U.N. sanctions.

The big picture: Iran's internal political dynamics are fraught with tension, as President Masoud Pezeshkian's administration grapples with paralysis and ineffective governance.

  • The regime is divided, with some ministries barely functioning and Pezeshkian publicly expressing frustration over the lack of progress.

Internal challenges: Economic hardship exacerbates political instability, as runaway inflation and shortages strain public patience.

  • Khamenei's call for price stability highlights the regime's disconnect from financial realities, with no clear plan to address fundamental economic woes.

What's next: Iran's negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency over nuclear inspections remain contentious, with unresolved disputes over inspector access.

  • The Islamic Republic now muddles through the most serious crisis of its forty-six-year history. Its military weakness stands exposed to the world.

  • It has lost much of its regional influence and credibility at home. It survives day-to-day by selling cut-rate oil to China, clinging to the hope that it can somehow extract a favorable deal from the West and avert another Israeli strike. It is not a bet that will likely pay off.

To read the full article, click here.

After Israeli, U.S. Strikes, Europeans Hope Snapback Threats Push Iran to Tougher Nuclear Deal

Though Iran does not seem to be rebuilding its nuclear program now, there is no guarantee it won't do so in another six months or a few years down the road. Iranian atomic energy exhibition at the Isl...
By: Lazar Berman

In a decisive move, Britain, France, and Germany have triggered the "snapback mechanism" to reinstate U.N. sanctions on Iran, citing non-compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal.

Why it matters: This step is crucial in the diplomatic push to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions, despite Tehran's resistance and ongoing cooperation with Moscow and Beijing.

  • Israel supports the sanctions but warns that Iran is unlikely to shift its stance without further pressure.

The big picture: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action's (JCPOA) collapse has shifted focus to tougher negotiations, with the E3 (Britain, France, and Germany) and Washington aiming for enhanced inspections and stricter limits on Iran's nuclear activities.

  • Iran's nuclear program remains in "suspended animation" following recent Israeli and U.S. strikes, but concerns about uranium stockpiles and potential covert pathways persist.

Strategic challenges: Tehran's potential withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty poses a significant threat to regional stability and could escalate tensions.

  • Concerted U.S. and European leadership is essential to enforce sanctions effectively, leveraging Israel's military credibility as a deterrent.

What's next: Diplomacy remains a critical avenue, but the path to conflict is also open if Iran persists with its nuclear ambitions and threats against international security.

To read the full article at the Times of Israel, click here.

The Iran Prosperity Project's Energy Goals Amid Constraints and Risks

Corruption, sanctions, and poor management have led to energy shortages and disruptions to public services in Iran.  Shutterstock
By: Umud Shokri

Reza Pahlavi's Iran Prosperity Project aims to rebuild Iran post-Islamic Republic, but the reality of Iran's systemic failures looms large.

Why it matters: Despite holding 17 percent of global natural gas reserves, Iran squanders its potential through rampant corruption, crippling sanctions, and inept management.

  • The nation endures gas shortages, blackouts, and a crumbling energy infrastructure, symptomatic of broader governance failures.

The big picture: The project ambitiously plans for energy reform and economic diversification, yet fails to address the entrenched corruption and military influence that stifle progress.

  • Promised reforms lack strategic clarity and risk management, making them more fantasy than feasible.

Challenges ahead: Iran's governance is marred by inefficiency and resistance to change, particularly from power networks tied to military interests.

  • The absence of clear investor protections and realistic timelines further undermines confidence in Iran's capacity for meaningful reform.

What's next: Without transparent, actionable strategies and international cooperation, Iran's energy sector will remain a casualty of its own making.

  • The Iran Prosperity Project's energy plan, like the Islamic Republic's itself, aims high but will falter due to Iran's complexity, corruption, and inefficiency.

To read the full article, click here.

Iran Suffers Sharp Decline in Revenues Amidst Its War with Israel

In 2025, Iran's gross domestic product is expected to shrink to $341 billion and its public debt has surged.  Shutterstock
By: Dalga Khatinoglu

New insights into the Twelve-Day War with Israel reveal the precarious state of Iran's economy, exacerbated by the conflict.

Why it matters: Despite avoiding major civilian infrastructure, the war's economic shockwaves have severely impacted Iran.

  • Government revenues in the first fiscal quarter hit only 40 percent of projections, while non-oil exports plummeted by 34 percent.

The big picture: Iran's economic woes are compounded by chronic budget deficits, soaring inflation, and a currency crisis.

  • The rial has lost over 98 percent of its value since 2012, now trading at around one million rials per U.S. dollar.

Challenges ahead: The looming "snapback mechanism" threatens to reinstate U.N. sanctions, further isolating Iran economically.

  • Tehran's strategy of public denial is insufficient as power cuts and resource shortages exacerbate public discontent.

What's next: With Saudi Arabia's GDP now three times larger than Iran's, the leadership must confront its failing strategy as economic pressures mount.

  • Iran's public diplomacy strategy might remain bluster and denial, but it is foolish for the Iranian leadership to believe that will be a winning strategy when the lights go out and the faucets run dry.

To read the full article, click here.

The Narrowband Communications and Security Implications of Iran's Space Drive

A NASA image shows the global communication network for the exchange of information by the internet and connected satellites for finance, cryptocurrency, or Internet of Things technology.  Shutterstoc...
By: Umud Shokri

Iran plans to launch twenty satellites under the "Shahid Soleimani Constellation" by 2025, aiming to expand Internet of Things services and bolster national space capabilities.

Why it matters: The constellation not only enhances Iran's technological autonomy but also serves dual military and civilian purposes, heightening regional tensions.

  • It supports communications and intelligence gathering, aligning with Tehran's "Two-Wing Doctrine" to deter adversaries and extend influence.

The big picture: Iran's cooperation with Russia in space technology underscores its "Look East" strategy, circumventing Western sanctions.

  • Western intelligence is alarmed by the overlap between satellite and missile technology, which could accelerate Iran's ballistic missile capabilities.

Geopolitical consequences: The project strengthens Iran's diplomatic clout and coordination with proxies, concerning neighboring states worried about increased regional influence.

  • Iran's space advancements may act as a counterbalance to U.S. and Israeli strategies in the Middle East, potentially shifting power dynamics and escalating tensions.

Strategic implications: The space program acts as a symbol of national pride but raises the risk of escalation amid existing regional hostilities.

  • The fact that satellite launches occur in conjunction with heightened hostilities, Israeli strikes on Iranian missile installations, or regional tensions implies that they also serve as strategic signals, increasing the possibility of a wider escalation.

To read the full article, click here.

Iran's War on Its Jewry in the Aftermath of a Conflict with Israel

In the aftermath of its Twelve-Day War with Israel in June 2025, Iran's clerical regime has arrested hundreds of citizens accused of spying for Israel.
By: Ahmad Hashemi

In the wake of its Twelve-Day War with Israel, Iran's regime has intensified its crackdown on the country's Jewish community, accusing them of espionage.

Why it matters: The regime's actions highlight its use of antisemitic tropes to vilify Israel and scapegoat minorities within Iran.

  • Jewish Iranians face increased surveillance and intimidation, with prominent community members arrested and interrogated.

The big picture: Tehran exploits its Jewish population for propaganda while forcing them to participate in anti-Israel demonstrations.

  • The regime's dual approach serves both its apocalyptic worldview and realpolitik, maintaining a facade of diversity for international audiences.

Strategic use of antisemitism: Iranian officials perpetuate conspiracy theories about Jewish power, further fueling antisemitism and justifying the regime's aggressive stance.

  • These narratives align with the regime's messianic beliefs, reinforcing its pursuit of dominance and hostility towards non-Shi'a groups.

What's next: While Tehran's treatment of its Jewish population will worsen, the regime is unlikely to persecute so completely that it would spark a mass exodus, for it still benefits from its ability to use Jews as living museum exhibits to maintain a facade of diversity and tolerance to both domestic and international audiences.

To read the full article, click here.

Further Reading:

It's not the culture war itself that kills, but the political violence born of the dehumanization of opponents by a self-proclaimed

Thank you for relying on the Middle East Forum for up-to-date analyses of the region. If you enjoyed this issue of the MEF Dispatch, please forward it to a friend. We invite you to use the comments feature to let us know your thoughts on the Dispatch and the issues we cover.

Sincerely,

Winfield Myers
Managing Editor, Middle East Forum
Director, Campus Watch

Was this edition useful?

Thumbs upThumbs down

Leave feedback

Your email will be recorded and shared with the sender

MEF, an activist think tank, deals with the Middle East, Islamism, U.S. foreign policy, and related topics, urging bold measures to protect Americans and their allies. Pursuing its goals via intellectual and operational means, the Forum recurrently has policy ideas adopted by the U.S. government.

Copyright © 2024 Middle East Forum, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

Middle East Forum
1650 Market Street, Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Powered by

This edition is powered by Axios HQ.

This email was sent by Middle East Forum via Axios HQ

0 коммент.:

Отправить комментарий