MEF Dispatch: Charlie Kirk; the Muslim Brotherhood; U.K. Islamists

пятница, 12 сентября 2025 г.

Analyzing Islamists' responses to the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Dexter Va

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Powered by Axios HQ
Middle East Forum Banner

Charlie Kirk; the Muslim Brotherhood; U.K. Islamists

By Winfield Myers ● Sep 12, 2025

Smart Brevity® count: 9.5 mins...2456 words

Analyzing Islamists' responses to the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Dexter Van Zile finds them filled with hate and glee. Sam Westrop takes an in-depth look at the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe and North America and sees a "collapsed" organization that receives far more attention than many more dangerous groups the West too often overlooks.

Jules Gomes reports on efforts to offer sharia-compliant student loans in the U.K., while Amira Halperin laments the radicalization of universities there—a development that cost her her professorship. The West's secularization, as exemplified in the new ideology of "Palestinianism," is among the underlying causes of such problems, writes Giulio Meotti.

We also feature articles by Amine Ayoub on the Gaza flotilla and Jonathan Spyer on Israel's ending of Qatar's immunity. Lazar Berman reports from Gaza City, and Dexter Van Zile urges the West to champion the United Arab Emirates' vision of hope and agency over Iran's cult of death and destruction.

Islamists Respond to Charlie Kirk's Assassination

For now, most Islamist organizations seem to be keeping a low profile in the aftermath of yesterday's assassination of conservative commentator and activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Some individual comme...
By: Dexter Van Zile

The assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University has exposed alarming responses from Islamists in the U.S.

Why it matters: These reactions reveal the disturbing mindset among some Islamist figures who not only justify but also mock political violence.

  • The rhetoric from these individuals reflects a broader acceptance of extremism that poses a threat to civil society and democratic values.

  • Some gloat or make light of his death, suggesting it was just desserts for his support for Israel as it fights to defeat Hamas in Gaza.

Driving the news: Daniel Haqiqatjou, founder of Muslim Skeptic, took to X to suggest that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered Kirk's assassination.

  • Hamzah Wald Maqbul, a YouTuber with a large following, openly expressed no sympathy for Kirk, branding him a "genocide denying race-baiter," thus justifying violence based on support for Israel.

What they're saying: Ahmed Rehab of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Chicago's office, while condemning the assassination, could not hide his disdain for Kirk, demonstrating the pervasive hostility towards differing viewpoints.

  • Yasir Qadhi, the imam at East Plano Islamic Center in Texas, used the assassination as a springboard to launch a furious attack on Israel, blaming the Jewish state for "genocide."

  • The U.K. news outlet 5Pillars posted a lengthy article under the headline, "Islamophobic U.S. commentator Charlie Kirk shot dead at university event."

The bottom line: The radical reactions to Kirk's assassination highlight a dangerous acceptance of violence among Islamists, underscoring the need for vigilance against extremist ideologies in the U.S.

To read the full article, click here.

Homegrown Islamism: The Inconsequence of the Muslim Brotherhood

In recent years, Western policymakers have conflated the Muslim Brotherhood with other Islamist movements and continue today to overstate its significance.
By: Sam Westrop

Western policymakers have overemphasized the Muslim Brotherhood's influence, overlooking more potent Islamist threats operating across Europe, North America, and elsewhere.

Why it matters: This misjudgment results in misguided legislation and law enforcement priorities, leaving room for more dangerous Islamist networks to flourish unchallenged.

  • The Egyptian Brotherhood, once a formidable global entity, has splintered, with regional branches like those in Jordan and Tunisia distancing themselves from Cairo's waning influence.

  • Analysts like Steven Merley caution against underestimating the Brotherhood's global networking, but there's scant evidence of any coordinated global directive.

The big picture: In the U.S., the Brotherhood's ideological legacy persists through groups like the Muslim Youth of North America, yet these operate under a distinctly American Islamist framework.

  • Organizations such as Jamaat-e-Islami and Dawat-e-Islami present significant threats, with Dawat-e-Islami linked to global acts of terror, including the 2020 attack outside Charlie Hebdo's offices in France.

What's next: Policymakers must pivot focus from the Muslim Brotherhood to tangible threats like Deobandi and Salafi networks, which are more active and pose a greater risk.

  • A nuanced understanding of the diverse Islamist movements in the U.S. is crucial for crafting effective counter-terrorism strategies and ensuring national security.

To read the full article, click here.

ICYMI: Israel Insider with Ashley Perry

September 10, 2025 | Israel Insider with Ashley Perry

The IDF is in the process of slowly completing its conquest of Gaza. U.S. media, meanwhile, has reported that a plan for the future governance of the area is being circulated by the U.S. Administration. Is the day after finally beginning to take shape?

Ashley Perry is an advisor to the Middle East Forum's Israel office. He served as adviser to Israel's minister of foreign affairs and deputy prime minister in 2009-15, and has also worked with Israel's Ministers of Intelligence, Agriculture and Rural Development, Energy, Water and Infrastructure, Defense, Tourism, Internal Security, and Immigrant Absorption and as an advisor to The Negev Forum. Originally from the U.K., he moved to Israel in 2001. He holds a B.A. from University College London and an M.A. from Reichman University (IDC Herzliya).

To watch the full podcast episode, click here.

Government to Offer Sharia-Compliant University Student Loans in U.K.

The Department of Education in the United Kingdom recently announced that under the new Shariah-compliant finance system, Muslim students will no longer be required to pay interest on government loans...
By: Jules Gomes

The U.K. government's plan to implement sharia-compliant (Islamic law) student loans is a troubling capitulation to Islamist pressures, embedding extremist ideologies in state policy.

Why it matters: This scheme, under the guise of financial inclusivity, risks empowering radical Islamist narratives that undermine Western democratic values and societal cohesion.

  • Critics warn that the Alternative Student Finance (ASF) initiative could serve as a Trojan Horse, introducing sharia principles into secular financial systems and normalizing Islamist ideologies.

Driving the news: The U.K. Islamic Financial Council (UKFIC), with controversial ties to figures like Naz Shah and Umer Suleman, is spearheading this initiative, revealing its true intentions.

  • The Muslim Council of Britain, a long-time advocate for sharia finance and its extremist affiliations, views this as a victory, emboldening other Islamist agendas.

The stakes: By accommodating sharia finance, the U.K. government risks legitimizing Islamism in a way that could lead to further societal division and radicalization.

  • Former Prime Minister David Cameron's promotion of Islamic finance has set a precedent, embedding sharia-compliant practices in the U.K.'s financial fabric, with potential long-term repercussions.

What's next: The policy offers further proof that Islamists in the West have no intention of assimilating into Western culture, but intend to carve out their own domains of influence, with an eye to exerting greater control over the organs of finance and governance.

To read the full article, click here.

Amira Halperin on Negotiating U.K. College Campuses Post-October 7

Amira Halperin, a British-Israeli professor of foreign policy and security in the U.K. and an international commentator, spoke to an August 25 Middle East Forum Podcast (video). The following summariz...
By: Marilyn Stern

Amira Halperin, a British-Israeli professor, highlighted on a recent MEF Podcast the rising Islamist radicalization risks at U.K. universities, particularly Coventry University where she taught.

Why it matters: The Prevent program, an outgrowth of the U.K.'s Counterterrorism and Security Act 2015, was designed to counter terrorism, but is failing as universities hesitate to enforce it, leaving radical influences unchecked.

  • Halperin was threatened by a Hamas-supporting student, yet Coventry University failed to protect her, siding instead with pro-Palestinian activists.

Driving the news: Post-October 7, the campus climate at Coventry worsened, with pro-Palestinian scholars accusing Israel of "genocide," while Hamas-supporting activists gained influence.

  • Halperin's reports of threats were ignored by the administration, emphasizing a preference for income over safety.

The big picture: U.K. universities maintain ties with terrorism-supporting institutions in Gaza and the West Bank, complicating counterterrorism efforts.

  • Pro-Palestinian campaigns, like the "right to education," often mask support for radical agendas.

What's next: Halperin advises U.K. Members of Parliament to defund institutions that glorify terrorism, revoke visas for radical students, and enforce free speech protections to combat campus radicalization.

To read the full summary and watch the podcast, click here.

Western Secularization Transposed Golgotha from the Individual Jew to the Collective Jew

The name Ramot, where Palestinian terrorists killed six Israelis on Sept. 8, 2025, comes from the biblical city of Ramah, where the prophet Samuel lived and was buried; the Ramot neighborhood of Jerus...
By: Giulio Meotti

"Palestinianism" is a political ideology gaining traction in parts of the West, characterized by its appeasement approach towards radical Islamist narratives. It is a reaction to spiritual fatigue within Western societies, where secularization has shifted traditional religious sentiments towards a new narrative.

Why it matters: Palestinianism presents a significant ideological shift, replacing the historical narrative of the individual Jew with the collective Jew as the target of a new Passion. This shift is not just symbolic but reflects deeper societal changes in values and alignments.

  • It acts as a substitute religion for the West, appealing to those disillusioned by traditional religious structures, offering a narrative of victimhood and martyrdom centered on the Palestinian Muslim.

Driving the news: The embrace of Palestianism by Western leaders, exemplified by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's measures against Israel, underscores a broader acceptance of this ideology.

  • Figures like Rafael Bardaji criticize this as a dangerous appeasement strategy, suggesting that it could lead to civilizational decline by emboldening radical Islamist elements.

The big picture: Palestinianism exploits Western guilt and historical grievances, presenting Israel as the oppressor in a secularized narrative that resonates with leftist ideologies. This narrative is propagated through dual messaging—violent in Arabic, victimized in Western languages.

  • "What would England do if Islamic terrorists killed 15,000 of its citizens in a single day?" Benjamin Netanyahu asked British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The author's answer: they would do nothing.

What's next: The West must learn from one of the most famous sayings attributed to Winston Churchill, the definition of an appeaser: "Someone who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last."

  • Palestinianism is the political ideology that part of the West has embraced in the hope of being eaten last.

To read the full article, click here.

The Flotilla Delusion: A Turkish Gambit, Not a Humanitarian Mission

The world watches as the latest Gaza flotilla sets sail, a fleet of ships ostensibly carrying
By: Amine Ayoub

The latest Gaza flotilla, under the guise of "humanitarian aid," is a strategic provocation led by Turkish interests, not a genuine relief effort.

Why it matters: These flotillas, primarily organized by the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), exploit the Palestinian cause for political gain, diverting attention from their ties to Islamist groups and Turkey's political machinations.

  • The IHH, linked to Hamas and supported by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's government, orchestrates these missions to provoke Israel, rather than to deliver aid.

Driving the news: The 2010 Mavi Marmara incident exemplified the flotillas' true nature, where activists, prepared for violence, clashed with Israeli forces enforcing a legal blockade.

  • President Erdoğan uses these flotillas to bolster his image as a Muslim leader, while the media spectacle serves his political narrative.

The big picture: Despite Israel's offer to transfer aid through Ashdod, flotilla organizers refuse, prioritizing political theater over genuine humanitarian relief.

  • The flotillas are a dangerous maritime gambit, designed to incite conflict and generate propaganda against Israel.

What's next: The world must not be fooled by this carefully constructed deception. To support these flotillas is not to support the people of Gaza; it is to embolden those who seek to use their suffering for political gain, and to fund a movement with documented links to extremism.

To read the full article, click here.

Israel Ends Qatar's Immunity

Qatar has presented itself to the west, and to Israel, as an appropriate mediator, a douser of the very fires it helps to set. An Israeli F-15 fighter.  Shutterstock
By: Jonathan Spyer

Israel's decisive strike on Hamas leaders in Doha underscores Qatar's duplicitous role in fueling terrorism under the guise of diplomacy.

Why it matters: Qatar has long acted as an enabler of Islamist extremism, providing financial and logistical support to groups like Hamas while masquerading as a mediator.

  • This action by Israel marks a necessary challenge to Qatar's strategy of arsonist and firefighter, demanding accountability for its deliberate destabilization of the region.

Driving the news: Qatar's support for Hamas is not incidental but a calculated element of its broader agenda to spread Islamist revolution across the Middle East.

  • Israel's targeted strike is a clear message that Doha's facilitation of terror activities will no longer be tolerated.

The big picture: Qatar's pervasive influence in Israeli political and security networks reflects a troubling penetration aimed at manipulating perceptions and policies.

  • The exposure of these connections highlights the urgent need for transparency and decisive countermeasures against Qatar's malign activities.

What's next: This is an opening of daylight onto one of the strangest and murkiest corners of the opaque Middle East strategic picture. It is long overdue.

To read the full article, click here.

Waiting for Gaza City Residents to Head South, Israel Readies New Aid Sites in Rafah

Almost no buildings are left standing in Rafah, and what was a city of almost 200,000 two years ago is now a sandy wasteland of broken concrete, twisted metal and packs of feral dogs sniffing hungrily...
By: Lazar Berman

In Rafah, Gaza, the Israel Defense Forces and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) are implementing new aid sites to deliver essentials directly to civilians, bypassing Hamas's influence.

Why it matters: The GHF has distributed over 161 million meals since May, with almost 1.2 million meals provided on a single day, ensuring aid reaches those in need without empowering Hamas.

  • This initiative addresses past issues where Hamas diverted aid for black market sales, using proceeds to recruit and arm fighters.

Driving the news: The new aid sites, expected to operate 24/7, feature improved safety measures and logistics to streamline distribution and minimize IDF-civilian conflicts.

  • The sites are strategically located to reduce travel distance for civilians, aiming for a 5-10 minute walk from key areas, enhancing accessibility.

The big picture: Following a controversial aid halt in March, which led to severe humanitarian crises, Israel has pivoted to prioritize humanitarian efforts amidst international pressure.

  • The GHF's expansion from three to potentially 16 sites reflects a strategic shift to balance security with humanitarian needs.

What's next: Despite hesitations from major aid groups, the GHF's ongoing operations demonstrate a commitment to overcoming logistical challenges and expanding aid delivery, critical for Gaza's population's survival and stability.

To read the full article at the Times of Israel, click here.

The West Must Choose the Vision of the United Arab Emirates, Not Iran, for the Middle East

Abi Dhabi's unique skyscrapers overlook a promenade in the capital of the United Arab Emirates.  Shutterstock
By: Dexter Van Zile

Almost two years ago, Hamas's brutal attack in Israel highlighted the depths of Islamist ideology's depravity, leaving 1,200 dead and 251 kidnapped.

Why it matters: While Hamas and Iran's actions perpetuate violence, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) exemplifies a path toward peace and progress, choosing coexistence over conflict.

  • Iran and Hamas's orchestration of the October 7 massacre aimed to derail regional peace efforts like the Abraham Accords.

Driving the news: The United Arab Emirates, whose leaders were the pioneers of the Abraham Accords, now work to make humanity a multi-planet species, most recently sending a probe to Mars to investigate its atmosphere.

  • While Iran faces economic collapse, the UAE invests in futuristic projects, fostering prosperity and innovation.

The big picture: While Hamas dug tunnels to sneak terrorists into Israel, hide weapons under hospitals, and imprison hostages, Dubai constructed the Burj Khalifa—the tallest building in the world.

  • Western liberals must recognize hostages as symbols of failure by rejectionist regimes, not trophies of ideological battles.

What's next: Helping the Middle East requires supporting those leaders and peoples who seek coexistence, not destruction of Israel or the promotion of intolerant Islamism. Leaders of civilized countries must not indulge Hamas at the United Nations, but rather celebrate those who take risks for peace.

To read the full article, click here.

We appreciate your continued support for the Middle East Forum as we deliver critical analyses on Middle Eastern affairs. If you found this edition of the Dispatch useful, please share it with others and be sure to let us know your thoughts on our coverage via the comments feature.

Sincerely,

Winfield Myers
Managing Editor, Middle East Forum
Director, Campus Watch

Was this edition useful?

Thumbs upThumbs down

Leave feedback

Your email will be recorded and shared with the sender

MEF, an activist think tank, deals with the Middle East, Islamism, U.S. foreign policy, and related topics, urging bold measures to protect Americans and their allies. Pursuing its goals via intellectual and operational means, the Forum recurrently has policy ideas adopted by the U.S. government.

Copyright © 2024 Middle East Forum, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

Middle East Forum
1650 Market Street, Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Powered by

This edition is powered by Axios HQ.

This email was sent by Middle East Forum via Axios HQ

0 коммент.:

Отправить комментарий